CursorFocus vs ScreenFlow

Both CursorFocus and ScreenFlow are Mac-only screen recorders. The key difference is how much manual editing each requires to produce a polished result.

Get CursorFocus — $79 one-time

Quick take

ScreenFlow is the better choice if you need a full multi-track editor. CursorFocus is faster for most tutorials and demos — zoom and cursor effects are applied automatically.

Side-by-side feature comparison

Feature	CursorFocus	ScreenFlow
Price	$79 one-time	$149 one-time
Auto-zoom on click	Yes	No
Cursor size and click highlights	Yes	No
Background music library	Yes	No
Mic / system audio controls	Volume / mute	No
Full timeline editor	partial	Yes
Canvas framing	Yes	partial
4K export	Yes	Yes
Shareable links	No	No
Mac only	Yes	Yes

CursorFocus

Automatic zoom effects, cursor size and click highlights, background music library, mic and system audio controls, and 4K export. $79 one-time. Minimal editing required.

ScreenFlow

Full Mac video editor and screen recorder. Multi-track timeline, callouts, and animations. $149 one-time. Manual workflow required.

Thinking of switching from ScreenFlow? Read the full ScreenFlow alternative guide for migration tips and pricing details.

Common questions

Is CursorFocus cheaper than ScreenFlow?

Yes. CursorFocus is $79 one-time, ScreenFlow is $149. CursorFocus also automates zoom effects that ScreenFlow requires you to add manually.

Does ScreenFlow have auto-zoom like CursorFocus?

No. ScreenFlow requires you to add every zoom effect manually on the timeline. CursorFocus detects clicks and applies zoom automatically.

When should I use ScreenFlow instead of CursorFocus?

If you need a full multi-track editing workflow with complex animations and callouts, ScreenFlow's editor is more capable. For most demo and tutorial recordings, CursorFocus is faster.

Try CursorFocus for yourself

Start with CursorFocus on your Mac and see how it compares to ScreenFlow.

Download / get CursorFocus See all features